# AMAN vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-25
Citation: CRM-M 21933/2026
Petitioner: AMAN
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=21933&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-25&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-21933-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 CRM-M-21933-2026 Decided on : 25.05.2026 Aman . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Shivansh Malik, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG, Haryana. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:- Name of FIR Date Section(s) Police District Petitioner(s) No. Station Aman 811 04.11.2023 S. 307, 323 & 34 of IPC, 1860 City Rohtak [corresponding S. 109, 115 & 3(5) of Rohtak BNS, 2023] During investigation S. 302 of IPC [corresponding S. 103 of BNS] was added and offence u/s 307 of IPC [corresponding S. 109 of BNS, was deleted, by learned Sessions Judge, Rohtak, while framing charges videorder dated 04.06.2024]. 2. Complainant – Chaman got registered the FIR in the present case alleging that on 03.11.2023 at about 10:30 P.M., he was standing

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/aman-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another