# AJEET SINGH AND ANOTHER vs RAMESH KUMAR AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-21
Citation: CR 2359/2026
Petitioner: AJEET SINGH AND ANOTHER
Respondent: RAMESH KUMAR AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CR&case_no=2359&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-21&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CR-2359-2026 Date of decision :21.05.2026 AJEET SINGH AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS RAMESH KUMAR AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. A.K. Ranolia, Advocate for the petitioners. **** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside of the impugned order dated 07.11.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Pataudi, whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Order V Rule 20 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for summoning of defendants by way of substituted service was dismissed. 2. It is submitted that the petitioners-plaintiffs has repeatedly been filing applications under Order I Rule 10 CPC for serving respondents/ defendants by way of substituted service and, while doing so, had duly asserted that the addresses mentioned in the memo of parties are the last known addresses of the respondents-defendants. 3. The learned Court below has categorically recorded a finding that the correct and complete addresses of the 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/ajeet-singh-and-another-vs-ramesh-kumar-and-others