# AAJAD SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-21
Citation: CRWP 6009/2026
Petitioner: AAJAD SINGH AND ANOTHER
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRWP&case_no=6009&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-21&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRWP No.6009 of 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 156 ***** CRWP No.6009 of 2026 Date of decision: 21.5.2026 Date of uploading : 21.5.2026 Aajad Singh and another …......Petitioners v. State of Haryana and others …......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Sudesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners --- SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners have approached this Court for issuance of necessary directions for protecting their life and liberties which according to them are at stake because they are in a live-in-relationship. The petitioners claim themselves to be major in terms of age. According to the copies of the Aadhar Cards (Annexure P-1 and P-2 respectively), the date of birth of the petitioner No.1-Aajad Singh is 15.7.2000 and the date of birth of the petitioner No.2-Anita is 8.3.1999. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a marriage is not a must for providing security to a couple in a ‘live-in-relationship’ because protection qua life and liberty is sacrosanct and stands at the highest pedestal. He has also placed reliance upon orders passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in ‘Sarabjeet Kaur and a

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/aajad-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others