# WRIT - C No. 7858 of 2026 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2026-03-18
Citation: WRIT - C No. 7858 of 2026 at Allahabad
Petitioner: WRIT - C No. 7858 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=79509)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 7858 of 2026 Lal Bihari Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Ashish Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. The petitioner is a complainant. The present writ petition has been filed by him with the prayer to direct the Respondent No.2, Tehsildar, Tehsil Madhiyahu, District Jaunpur to decide the Case No.RST/4385 of 2024, Computerized Case No.T202414360604385, (Gram Sabha vs. Rajaram) under Section 67 of Land Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period. 2. When a query was raised by the Court regarding the locus of the petitioner, no satisfactory reply has been given. 3. Apart from the same nothing has been stated in the entire writ petition nor any argument has been raised that how the petitioner fall within the definition of 'person aggrieved'. Even otherwise from perusal of the entire writ petition and after hearing counsel for the petitioner the Court is of the opinion that petitioner does not fall within definition of "Aggrieved Person". 4. The existence of a right in favour of an aggri

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/writ-c-no-7858-of-2026-at-allahabad