# WRIT - A No. 2685 of 2026 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2026-03-10
Citation: WRIT - A No. 2685 of 2026 at Allahabad
Petitioner: WRIT - A No. 2685 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=85457)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2685 of 2026 Jaswant Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Yadav, Dileep Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Dileep Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Constable on 20.02.1984. Thereafter, he was promoted on the post of Head Constable and superannuated on 31.08.2024, however, he has been paid computation of the income to the tune of Rs.6,13,334/- in place of Rs.12,00,000/- and the total family pension has been calculated to Rs.18,120/- in place of Rs.19,230/- along with other benefits. 3. Prayer in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to rectify the error and to revise the benefits, which are liable to be paid and is admissible to the writ petitioner. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner is to be decided at the first instance by Respondent no.4. 5. Consi

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/writ-a-no-2685-of-2026-at-allahabad