# UOI & ORS. vs B.N.CHAUBEY & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-03-23
Citation: W.P.(C)-980/2004 2026:DHC:2359-DB
Petitioner: UOI & ORS.
Respondent: B.N.CHAUBEY & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/75023032026CW9802004_173140.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 16.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 23.03.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 23.03.2026 + W.P. (C) 980/2004 and W.P. (C) 981-982/2004 UOI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Pratima N Lakra, CGSC along with Mr. Shailendra Kumar Mishra and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advs. versus B.N. CHAUBEY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Palli and Ms. Niyati Razdan, Advs. for R-2. + W.P. (C) 17658/2004 and W.P.(C) 17659-17660/2004 THE UOI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain and Ms. Shreya Manjari, Advs. versus BADRI PRASAD PRAJAPATI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Palli & Ms. Niyati Razdan, Advs. + W.P. (C) 1786/2004 UOI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC along with Ms. Himanshi Singh & Ms. Monalisha Pradhan Advs. versus V.P. SHARMA .....Respondent Through: 1. The present batch of three petitions assail the correctness of judgments and orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as „Tribunal‟] whereby the lis concerning the age of superannuation of the Respondents was adjudicated. The controversy centres around their retirement at the a

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/uoi-ors-vs-b-n-chaubey-ors