# TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD vs NITIN KUMAR AGGARWAL

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-03-17
Citation: ARB.P.-950/2025 2026:DHC:2239
Petitioner: TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD
Respondent: NITIN KUMAR AGGARWAL

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68017032026AA9502025_122325.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 17.03.2026 ARB.P. 950/2025 TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Ms. Anshita Argal and Ms. Sandhya Chawla, Advocates. versus NITIN KUMAR AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. J.S. Rawat and Mr. Rajiv Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeks the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes as between the parties arising out of a Loan/Facility Agreement dated 30.09.20162. 2. The Agreement contains a dispute resolution clause, namely clause 12.11. The relevant portion of the said Clause 12.11 reads as under:- “12.11 Dispute Resolution a) If any dispute, difference or claim arises between the parties hereto in connection with this Agreement or the Security hereof or the validity, in interpretation, 1 Act 2 Agreement 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent, at the outset, submits that the present Petition seeking appointment of an Arbitrator is not maintainable on the ground that, 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/tata-capital-housing-finance-ltd-vs-nitin-kumar-aggarwal