# SHEHZAD @KARO vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-03-10
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-715/2026 2026:DHC:1989
Petitioner: SHEHZAD @KARO
Respondent: THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60810032026BA7152026_174338.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 10.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 715/2026, CRL.M.A. 5551/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5550/2026 SHEHZAD @KARO .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manohar Naagar and Mr. Akhil Gusain, Advocates versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Abhay Bhati CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No.580/2023 of Police Station Madhu Vihar for offence under Section 392/394/397/34 IPC. 2. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for the State assisted by IO/SI Abhay Bhati. 3. Broadly speaking, the prosecution case is that the complainant de facto met the present accused/applicant, who pretended as if he had been hit by a TSR in front of Max Hospital. When the complainant de facto got down from his car to help the accused/applicant, two boys standing nearby came on a motorcycle and after snatching the gold chain worn by the BAIL APPLN. 715/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 4. It is contended by learned counsel for accused/applicant that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated. It is

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/shehzad-karo-vs-the-state-nct-of-delhi