# RAMESH vs STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-03-10
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-918/2026 2026:DHC:1991
Petitioner: RAMESH
Respondent: STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60810032026BA9182026_174418.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 10.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 918/2026, CRL.M.A. 6958/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6959/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6960/2026 RAMESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhakar Tiwari, Mr. Ajay Kr. Srivastav and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates versus STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Rajak Ahmad CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 357/2024 of Police Station Chitranjan Park for offence under Section 309(6)/310(2)/311/317(3)/61(2)/3(5) BNS and Section 25/27 of the Arms Act. 2. Learned APP for the State accepts notice. 3. On behalf of accused/applicant, it is contended that all remaining co- accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court on different dates after detailed discussion comparing the contents of the belated FIR in BAIL APPLN. 918/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569 af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH 4. Learned APP submits that this is not a case of parity because the snatched anklet was recovered from the present accused/applicant. It is contended that co-accused Waris had snatch

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/ramesh-vs-state-of-gnct-of-delhi