# PATIALA LACE HOUSE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR vs THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER AND ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-03-28
Citation: W.P.(C)-12102/2025 2026:DHC:2767
Petitioner: PATIALA LACE HOUSE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR
Respondent: THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER AND ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59628032026CW121022025_125533.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12102/2025 Date of Decision: 28.03.2026 IN THE MATTER OF: PATIALA LACE HOUSE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Narender Singh Yadav, Advocate. versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Salil Paul, Mr. Sahil Paul and Mr. Harmeet Singh Phillip, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) This matter has been taken up today, as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday. 1. The petition is for the following reliefs: (a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari and set- aside the Order dated 31.08.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Punjab in Appeal No.15 of 20.; and/or (b) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the genuine claim as per survey by independent 2. The sole reason for the petitioner approaching this Court is that the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), is situated in Delhi, and has entertained revision petition arising from the order dated 31.08.2022 (hereinafter „im

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/patiala-lace-house-through-its-proprietor-vs-the-new-india-assurance-through-its-branch-manager-and-ors