# MR. NILESH PRAKASHRAO MORE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU ITS URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ORS

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2026-03-27
Citation: WP/5798/2023
Petitioner: MR. NILESH PRAKASHRAO MORE
Respondent: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU ITS URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND ORS

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6InVFeFlLVEhlT1NsVXIrVUtkUEFoSXc9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiSE8wM28xZmdIdStDUDRKaGxrWDdtSVV3VlNMdEh2YXRteGhTeUpIeVBUWDFwbEJoUnNwMEhlNGptcWJ2VWpocmkxaHIyTEN1dm5iSXYyVzlpZy9mYXc9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjU2MTAyMWIwOTdkOTdkNGY3NjA3OGZkNGIyYWMxN2Q4NTA4Mjk3YmU2MTU1OWQ0OTRlYWRhMzMxNTZkMThiMWEiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782763280&signature=e0019ed119193e0ba322b73fd4bb6604628129f9a6c2509ed6f9a9d57287cc5a)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1-WP-5798-2023-(C).odt 1. Mr. Nilesh Prakashrao More, Age : 37 years, Occ. Agriculturist, Indian inhabitant, Residing at “Shri Swami Samarth” 330, Gajanan chowk Phaltan, District : Satara, Pin : 415523 ….Petitioner Versus 1. State of Maharashtra Through its Urban Development Department, [Summons to be served on the Learned Government Pleader appearing for the State of Maharashtra under Order XXVII, Rule 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908]. 2. Regional Transport Office (RTO) 213, E Ward, Tarabai Park, Warna Colony, Kolhapur District, Pin – 416003 [Summons to be served on the Learned Government Pleader appearing for the State of Maharashtra under Order XXVII, Rule 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908]. 3. Chief Executive Officer of the Phaltan Nagar Parishad, Phaltan, District : Satara. [Summons to be served on the Learned Government Pleader appearing for the State of Maharashtra under Order Sunny Thote ...1 1-WP-5798-2023-(C).odt XXVII, Rule 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908] 4. District Collector Satara, Satara. [Summons to be served on the Learned Government Pleader appearing for the State of Maharashtra under Order XXVII, Rule 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/mr-nilesh-prakashrao-more-vs-state-of-maharashtra-thru-its-urban-development-dept-and-ors