# MOHD SHAH FAHAD vs RAGHAV NATHANI & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-03-23
Citation: RFA(COMM)-27/2024 2026:DHC:2717-DB
Petitioner: MOHD SHAH FAHAD
Respondent: RAGHAV NATHANI & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/CHS23032026RFAC272024_181815.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA(COMM) 27/2024 MOHD SHAH FAHAD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pulkit Thareja, Adv. versus RAGHAV NATHANI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Respondent 1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER (ORAL) % 23.03.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This is a peculiar case in which, though the appellant and the respondents, who were litigating before the learned Commercial Court, had filed a settlement agreement and requested the learned Commercial Court to pass a consent decree in terms of the settlement agreement, the learned Commercial Court refused to do so and has proceeded to dismiss the suit. 2. The appellant is represented through Mr. Pulkit Thareja and Respondent 1, who is the only contesting respondent, are present in person. They pray ad idem that the impugned judgment may be set aside and the suit decreed in terms of the settlement agreement dated 27 September 2023. 3. We have perused the contents of the settlement agreement dated 27 September 2023. We find that it is in order and is enforceable in law. 4. In the circumstances, we do not desire to express our opinion with respect to the de

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/mohd-shah-fahad-vs-raghav-nathani-anr