# MOHAN LAL CHOUDHARY vs STATE THROUGH SHO SPECIAL CELL

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-03-09
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-3276/2025 2026:DHC:1926
Petitioner: MOHAN LAL CHOUDHARY
Respondent: STATE THROUGH SHO SPECIAL CELL

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60809032026BA32762025_180801.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 3276/2025 MOHAN LAL CHOUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Mr. Narender and Ms. Neha Ghugtyal, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH SHO SPECIAL CELL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with Inspector Sanjeev Kumar, PS Special Cell. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The applicant/accused seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 154/2023 of Police Station Special Cell for offence under Section 18 & 29 of the NDPS Act. 2. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that on the basis of a secret information, a raiding team was constituted which intercepted the truck owned and being driven by the accused/applicant and the said truck was found to contain 41.260 kg of opium, which is a commercial quantity. According to prosecution, the said contraband was being transported in his truck by the accused/applicant from Manipur to BAIL APPLN. 3276/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569 af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant contends that he is innocent and has been falsely implicate

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/mohan-lal-choudhary-vs-state-through-sho-special-cell