# CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1133 of 2026 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2026-03-24
Citation: CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1133 of 2026 at Allahabad
Petitioner: CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1133 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=78812)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1133 of 2026 Juvenile X .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Arun Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Gorakh Yadav, G.A. Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard Sri Arun Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Gorakh Yadav, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2/informant. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 16.01.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad in Juvenile Criminal Appeal No. 69 of 2025 (Juvenile N vs. State of U.P. and another), and the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by learned Juvenile Justice Board, Fatehgarh, Farrukhabad in Bail Application No. 2928/2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 144/2025, under Section 70(2), 115(2), 351(3) BNS, 5(g)/6 POCSO Act, and Section 3(1)(Da), 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, Police Station Kampil, District Farrukhabad. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits: (i) admittedly, the applicant was a juvenile aged about 16 years, 4 months and 18 days on the date of al

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/criminal-revision-no-1133-of-2026-at-allahabad