# CAPGEMINI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA LTD vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2026-03-24
Citation: WP/16068/2024
Petitioner: CAPGEMINI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA LTD
Respondent: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6ImFCaU9jbFdHZlJaSkhHUnVLZFozZEE9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiZHIwT0dUZkZhK0N5K2EwQkFLcUtFN2hyMkhpTzVnUHNmYjUyUW5KL2dWblQvSHR0UVRCQXVXT1N5YjV5NkZzYy9ZQW5WamZITS9qYTZtVHpwYkJLcnc9PSIsIm1hYyI6ImNmN2RmY2M2MDdmOWViNDdkNzgxZDYwZDAzYWI4MDgyMTQwZjJkODNhNjRhMGE0MGNkZDE5NmU1ZWNkMzY0MGUiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782763280&signature=9725bf5f005176cd06bb6ad9e9dfda3626f00debf00dba7d75d25670500f5cdd)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1.wp.16068.2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.16068 OF 2024 Capegemini Technology Services India Ltd .. Petitioner Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 1(1), Pune & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Dharan V. Gandhi a/w Aanchal Vyas, Advocates for the UTKARSH KAKASAHEB Petitioner. BHALERAO 3. CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE : MARCH 24, 2026 ORAL JUDGMENT:- (PER B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) 1. Rule. Respondents waive service. With the consent of parties, Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2. By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner challenges the alleged outstanding demands of Rs.3,28,785/- for A.Y.2001-02, Rs.1,24,577/- for A.Y.2002-03 and Rs.28,87,714/- for A.Y.2003-04 and the recovery notice dated MARCH 24, 2026 Utkarsh 1.wp.16068.2024.doc 05.02.2023 issued under Section 220 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”). 3. Brief facts of the case are as follows:- (a) Vide an order dated 16.05.2007, passed by the Delhi High Court in Company Petition No.49-51 of 2007, Flextronics Software Systems Limited (“erstwhile entity”) got amalgamated with 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/capgemini-technology-services-india-ltd-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-income-tax-and-ors