# APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 2635 of 2026 at Lucknow

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2026-03-30
Citation: APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 2635 of 2026 at Lucknow
Petitioner: APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 2635 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=83811)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2635 of 2026 Vipin Yadav And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh, Shailesh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Naresh Kumar Pathak Court No. - 16 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Naresh Kumar Pathak, Advocate, on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Virijendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record. 3. By means of the instant application, the applicants have prayed to quash the S.T. No.519 of 2022, Crime No.243 of 2021 (State Versus Vipin Yadav and others) U/S-363/366/376/504/506 IPC & 3/4 POCSO ACT, P.S.-Jahangirabad, District-Barabanki pending in the Court of Learned Additional District & Session Judge/Special Judge (POCSO ACT) Court No.45 Barabanki in the light of compromise dated 04.10.2025. 4. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to certain misunderstanding, the instant FIR was lodged against the applicants and

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/march/application-u-s-482-no-2635-of-2026-at-lucknow