# XYZ THROUGH OFFICER IN CHARGE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2026-06-30
Citation: IA/2126/2026
Petitioner: XYZ THROUGH OFFICER IN CHARGE
Respondent: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6InFXR1RncnEzOVJ4MGtEY05LZXJmc3c9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiTWpCVHVsL3V3RkdpUXAvZ1FGYjcycS9BRSttRzV5ZElYbzYrYWRKOVNEeEMzQk1VbGhrNXVvYklvWmlyTms5TjVSd1pwVXFUdzI3MEZCbis1WUIvU2c9PSIsIm1hYyI6Ijc4MWE4MTg3OTA0NWIyZTQ4YTNmZThjOGMxYzkxYzA3MWI1YmE4NDBlZjZlZTBkZGY2ZmJlMDU4YTkyOTM2MDYiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1783015251&signature=77ba77602a5829c73ef7e9dd95b42ee1fbe53e36e176a6c8260bb928159f8b1a)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

P.H. JAYANI 901 WP2823.2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2823 OF 2026 Shankesh Prithviraj Sanghvi …. Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra …Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2126 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2823 OF 2026 XYZ …. Intervenor In the matter between :- Shankesh Prithviraj Sanghvi …. Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Aabad Ponda, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr. Veerdhawal Deshmukh, Mr. Mihir Nakrani, Mr. Suresh Jambhale, Adv. Londhe, Adv. Shubham Shingade and Mr. Vinod Shingade i/b. One Access for the Petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent – State. Mr. Sudeep Pasbola, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr. Chinmay Gudse and Ms. Anjali Joshi i/b. Adv. Hrutik R. Chavan for the Intervenor. Ms. Archana Patil, Police Inspector, Tardeo Police Station, Mumbai, present. CORAM: SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. RESERVED ON : 24th JUNE, 2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 30th JUNE, 2026 JUDGMENT :- . Present Petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”) and under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prays for following reliefs :- P.H. JAYANI 901 WP2823.2

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/xyz-through-officer-in-charge-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra