# VENKATTARAMAIAH vs USHA

Court: madras High Court
Date: 2026-06-24
Petitioner: VENKATTARAMAIAH
Respondent: USHA

[Official PDF on madras High Court website](https://mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/2089530)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

S.A.(MD)No.543 of 2012 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI S.A.(MD)No.543 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 Venkattaramaiah .. Appellant Vs. 1.Usha 2.Kowsalya 3.Uma 4.Devika 5.Pandi .. Respondents Prayer : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court dated 17.08.2010 made in A.S.No.96 of 2002 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, modifying the judgment and decree of the trial court dated 09.01.2001 made in O.S.No.708 of 1988 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/07/2026 03:44:33 pm ) S.A.(MD)No.543 of 2012 For Appellant : Mr.Vinoth, Advocate For R1 to R4 : Mr.R.Anandaraj, Advocate R5 : No Appearance JUDGMENT Today, this matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the sole appellant and the learned counsel for respondents 1 to 4 are present before this Court. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the sole appellant submits that he is unable to state whether the so

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/venkattaramaiah-vs-usha