# TINKU ALIAS LALA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-06-30
Citation: CRM-M 34602/2026
Petitioner: TINKU ALIAS LALA
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=34602&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-06-30&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

REEMA SAINI 2026.06.30 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-34602 of 2026(O&M) -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was innocent and had been falsely implicated on account of an earlier dispute between the complainant and co-accused Suresh alias Sunny. Two co-accused namely Vinay @ Kullan who was armed with ice pick and Manoj had since been allowed regular bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad and petitioner, who was in custody for the last 3 months, too was entitled to the concession on the ground of parity. 4. Learned State counsel has filed custody certificate and has opposed the prayer for regular bail arguing that petitioner was attributed lathi blows and his identity was clearly disclosed from the CCTV footage collected by the police. Learned counsel further submits that challan stood presented in the Court. Petitioner, who was in custody in three other cases did not deserve the concession of bail. 5. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. As per FIR, the assailants were in muffled faces. He has been attributed simple injuries with lathi and is in custody fo

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/tinku-alias-lala-vs-state-of-haryana