# T.Boopathi, vs The Commissioner

Court: madras High Court
Date: 2026-06-23
Petitioner: T.Boopathi,
Respondent: The Commissioner

[Official PDF on madras High Court website](https://mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/1344968)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

WP No. 23382 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-06-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 23382 of 2026 T.Boopathi, Petitioner(s) Vs The Commissioner Palladam Municipality, Palladam, Tiruppur-641 664 Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, directing the respondent to refund the total security deposit amount of Rs.7,55,456/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Fifty-Five Thousand Four Hundred and fifty-six only) together with interest at 9 percent per annum from the date of vacation of the shop until the date of actual payment, to the petitioner For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Karpagam For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Anand for respondent ORDER By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. This writ petition has been filed for a direction, directing the respondent to refund the total security deposit amount of Rs.7,55,456/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Fifty-Five Thousand Four Hundred and fifty-six only) together with interest at 9 percent per annum from the date of vacation of the shop until the date of actual payment, to the petitioner 3. It is the case of the petitioner tha

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/t-boopathi-vs-the-commissioner