# SUNIL KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-06-23
Citation: CRM-M 33990/2026
Petitioner: SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=33990&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-06-23&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 CRM-M-33990-2026 Date of Decision: 23.06.2026 SUNIL KUMAR ....Petitioner V/s STATE OF HARYANA .…Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Sandeep Singh Jattan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sherwell, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Rajinder K. Singal, Advocate for the complainant. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition preferred under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short the ‘BNSS’) is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.80 dated 09.04.2026 registered under Sections 310 (4), 310 (2) of BNS (the offence under Section 238 of BNS added subsequently in the FIR) at Police Station Mullana, District Ambala. 2. On a complaint having been submitted by one Avinash Verma, the FIR in question was registered, the contents of which are as under:- “To Station House Officer, Police Station Mullana. Subject- Regarding the assault on the applicant by the accused Rohit, Sunil, Himanshu. Ajay and 2/3 of their other associates and robbing the applicant of Rs.5 lakh. Sir, it is requested that I, Avinash Verma, son of Sanjeev Kumar Verma, res

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/sunil-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana