# SUNEHA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-06-30
Citation: CRWP 7621/2026
Petitioner: SUNEHA AND ANOTHER
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRWP&case_no=7621&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-06-30&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CRWP-7621-2026 Date of decision :30.06.2026 SUNEHA AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Ms. Varinder Basa, Advocate for the petitioners. Dr. D.S. Lamba, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are seeking protection of their lives and liberty as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Dr. D.S. Lamba, Addl. A.G., Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Service of notice to the private respondents is dispensed with as no adverse order is passed against them. 4. As per petition and documents enclosed therewith i.e. Aadhar Card issued by the Government of India, petitioner No.1-Suneha is aged 21 years and petitioner No.2- Vivek Raj is aged 24 years. The petitioners are residing with MANOJ KUMAR each other after the marriage which is solemnized on 24.06.2026 at Prachin 2026.06.30 11:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this doc

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/suneha-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others