# Shaik Ibrahim vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Su

Court: madras High Court
Date: 2026-06-25
Petitioner: Shaik Ibrahim
Respondent: State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Su

[Official PDF on madras High Court website](https://mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/2089182)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

Crl.OP(MD).No.12300 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.06.2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.OP.(MD)No.12300 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.12178 of 2026 1. SHAIK IBRAHIM (Wrongly mentioned in the FIR as Shekibrahim instead of Shaik Ibrahim) 2. ABDUL RASHEETH (Wrongly mentioned in the FIR as Abdul Rasith instead of Abdul Rasheeth) S/o. 3. DUFAIL AHAMED (Wrongly mentioned in the FIR as Thubail Ahamed instead of Dufail Ahamed) 4. SADAM HUSSAIN (Wrongly mentioned in the FIR as Satham Usuain instead of Sadam Hussain) ...Petitioners Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Sub-Inspector Of Police, Kumbakonam Taluk Police Station, Thanjavur TamilNadu-612 001. Cr.No. 675 / 2020. ...Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023, to call for the entire records in Crime No. 675 of 2020, on the file of the Respondent Police and QUASH the same as against the Petitioners and pass any other order or orders. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/07/2026 07:19:11 pm ) Crl.OP(MD).No.12300 of 2026 For Petitioner : M/s.A.Rajamohamed For Respondent : Mr.J.Vishnu Government Advocate(crl.side) For R1 & R2 ORDER 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/shaik-ibrahim-vs-state-of-tamilnadu-rep-by-su