# SANGEETA NEGI vs BHARTI PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-06-04
Citation: LPA-589/2025 2026:DHC:5058-DB
Petitioner: SANGEETA NEGI
Respondent: BHARTI PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68304062026LPA5892025_150231.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 05.02.2026 % Judgment delivered on: 04.06.2026 LPA 589/2025 SANGEETA NEGI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sermon Rawat and Ms. Aastha Vishwakarma, Advocates. versus BHARTI PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. B.C. Pandey, Mr. S.P. Kamrah, Mr. Puneet Batra and Mr. Aryavansh Kamrah, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Vishruti Pandey, Mr. Sachin Garg, Advocates for R-3 to R- 5. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA JUDGMENT DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, C.J. 1. As to whether, the petitioner who is a teacher working with the respondent-School, which is a recognized but un-aided and privately managed, is entitled to the benefit of Child Care Leave (hereinafter referred to as „CCL’) is the question which engages our attention in this intra-court appeal. 2. The appellant instituted W.P.(C) 11903/2025, with a prayer to issue a direction to the respondent-School to grant her CCL for the period between 7600. We may note at this juncture itself that the learned Single Judge in Beena Arora (supra) has placed reliance on M.I. Hussain v. Director of Education, 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/sangeeta-negi-vs-bharti-public-school-ors