# SAKSHI PATHAK AND ANOTHER vs UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-06-22
Citation: CRWP 7273/2026
Petitioner: SAKSHI PATHAK AND ANOTHER
Respondent: UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRWP&case_no=7273&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-06-22&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 128 CRWP-7273-2026 Date of decision: 22.06.2026 Sakshi Pathak and another ...Petitioners Versus Union Territory Chandigarh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present : Mr. Amit Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Satish Kumar, Addl. PP, U.T. Chandigarh. ***** AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.(ORAL) 1. Apprehending threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents, petitioners have filed the present petition praying therein to issue appropriate directions to the official respondents to provide adequate protection to them. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1-U.T Chandigarh states that statements of both the petitioners have been recorded wherein they have mentioned that now they have no threat to their life and liberty from the private respondents. Copies of the said statements have been placed on record. 3. When questioned, the aforesaid fact has been endorsed by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (AARADHNA SAWHNEY) JUDGE 22.06.2026 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether repo

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/sakshi-pathak-and-another-vs-union-territory-chandigarh-and-others