# ROHIT vs STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-06-22
Citation: CRWP 7290/2026
Petitioner: ROHIT
Respondent: STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRWP&case_no=7290&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-06-22&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7290-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.06.2026 Rohit ....Petitioner Versus The State of U.T., Chandigarh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Viren Sibal, APP, U.T., Chandigarh (through V.C.) HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members at the hands of the private respondents and to take appropriate legal action against respondent No.4 on the basis of the allegations made in representation dated 15.06.2026 (Annexure P-1). 2. The case has been called twice since morning and despite that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. 3. In view of the above, having left with no other option, present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 22.06.2026 yakub Whether speaking/r

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/rohit-vs-state-of-u-t-chandigarh-and-others