# RAKESH AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-06-19
Citation: CRM-M 33836/2026
Petitioner: RAKESH AND ANR
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=33836&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-06-19&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 Date of decision: 19.06.2026 CRM-M-33836-2026 RAKESH AND ANOTHER ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .......Respondent CRM-M-33861-2026 RAJNISH @ KALA @ RAJNEESH ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. L.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Both these petitions for seeking regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 61 dated 06.03.2026, registered under Section(s) 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 190, 191(3), 351(3), 110 of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Badli, District Jhajjar are being decided by common order. VISHAL SHARMA 2026.06.20 13:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-33836-2026 and CRM-M-33861-2026 -2- 2. A brief reference to the facts is, however, being made from CRM- M-33836-2026 titled as ‘Rakesh and another versus State of Haryana’. 3. Briefly stated, the present FIR was registered on the statement of Sandeep son of Japan, resident of Village Pelpa and the then serving Sarpanch of the said village. The complainant alleged that on 04.03.2026,

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/rakesh-and-anr-vs-state-of-haryana