# P.Senthil Kumar vs R.Thamilarasan

Court: madras High Court
Date: 2026-06-23
Petitioner: P.Senthil Kumar
Respondent: R.Thamilarasan

[Official PDF on madras High Court website](https://mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/1344865)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRL OP No. 9398 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No. 9398 of 2026 P.Senthil Kumar S/O. Late S.Palani, No.21, Bajanai Koil Street, Red Hills, Chennai 600 052. ..Petitioner(s) Vs R.Thamilarasan S/O. Ravi, No.21, Mercy Nagar, Puzhal, Chennai – 600 066. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying for a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri to dispose of C.C.No.268 of 2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Ms.A.Anuradha For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Madhan ORDER The petitioner as complainant filed a private complaint in C.C.No.268 of 2025 against the respondent/accused for offences under Sections 227, 231, 334, 337, 338336, 339, 340 and 338 of BNS, 2023. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 01/07/2026 02:21:55 pm ) CRL OP No. 9398 of 2026 2.The contention of the petitioner is that the respondent is a tenant only to a small portion, but on his own, he occupied the other portion of the petitioner’s property, created forged documents and also submitted before the registration a

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/p-senthil-kumar-vs-r-thamilarasan