# NARASIMHAN vs M KAMALA

Court: madras High Court
Date: 2026-06-24
Petitioner: NARASIMHAN
Respondent: M KAMALA

[Official PDF on madras High Court website](https://mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/1345605)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

SA No. 589 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR SA No. 589 of 2020 1.Narasimhan 2.Dhamodharan 3.Kumar ..Appellant(s) Vs 1.M.Kamala 2.Manimekalai@ Mekala 3.M.Pandiyan 4.Ms.Angaiyarkanni @ Rani 5.Elavarasi 6.M.Elango 7.Veni ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Second appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree in AS.No. 2/2018 dated 17.10.2019 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 09.08.2017 in OS.No. 327/2017 on the file of District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu. For Appellant(s): M.Aravindan For Respondent(s): M/s.M.Rajasekar for R7 R5 & R6-served- No appearance R1 to R4-Notice dispensed with JUDGMENT The unsuccessful plaintiffs are the appellants. The suit was filed seeking declaration that settlement deed executed by first defendant in favour of defendant 2 to 6 was null and void. They also sought for declaration that __________ Page1 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/07/2026 06:15:01 pm ) SA No. 589 of 2020 subsequent sale deed executed by defendants 2 to 6 in favour of 7 th

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/narasimhan-vs-m-kamala