# M.Boopathi vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By In

Court: madras High Court
Date: 2026-06-19
Petitioner: M.Boopathi
Respondent: State Of Tamilnadu Rep By In

[Official PDF on madras High Court website](https://mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/2086597)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.OP.(MD)No.2142 of 2026 1.M.Boopathi 2.S.Sathish Kumar ...Petitioners Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by Inspector of Police, Lalgudi Police Station, Trichy District. In Crime No. 370 of 2017. 2. Latha ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to call for the records in Crime No.370 of 2017 on the file of 1st respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioners : M/s.M.Vijayakalidass For Respondents : Mr.J.Vishnu Government Advocate(crl.side) for R1 M/s.P.Gokul Kannan for R2 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 25/06/2026 03:28:45 pm ) ORDER The present petition has been filed by A2 & A3 in crime No.370 of 2017, on the file of the first respondent police seeking to quash the FIR wherein they are charged with the offences under Sections 294(b), 324, 427 and 506(ii) of IPC. 2. Pending investigation, the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the defacto complainant had agreed for quashing of the FIR. 3. Today, the defacto complainant is present in-person and she acknowledges the fact that she had agreed 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/m-boopathi-vs-state-of-tamilnadu-rep-by-in