# K.Sathyaseelan vs State rep.by

Court: madras High Court
Date: 2026-06-25
Petitioner: K.Sathyaseelan
Respondent: State rep.by

[Official PDF on madras High Court website](https://mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/1348074)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRL OP No. 16114 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No. 16114 of 2026 K.Sathyaseelan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.State rep.by Inspector of Police, Nagapattinam All women Police Station, Nagapattinam-611001. Cr.No.31 of 2023. 2.P.Susmitha ..Respondent(s) To call for the records in Spl.SC.No.10 of 2024 pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Special court under POCSO Act at Nagapattinam, and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Kumar Pichandi For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran, G.A.(Crl. Side), for R1 ORDER The petitioner/accused, who is facing trial in Spl.SC.No.10 of 2024 before the learned Sessions Judge, Special court under POCSO Act at Nagapattinam, has filed this Criminal Original Petition. __________ Page1 of 9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/07/2026 05:45:32 pm ) CRL OP No. 16114 of 2026 2.The case of the prosecution is that the second respondent/de facto complainant, who was a minor, had love affair with the petitioner and they also had physical relationship. As a result, the second respondent/de facto complainant conceived and the same was confirmed at the Government Medical

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/k-sathyaseelan-vs-state-rep-by