# GURINDER JAGDEO vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-06-25
Citation: CWP 19339/2026
Petitioner: GURINDER JAGDEO
Respondent: DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=19339&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-06-25&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CWP No.19339 of 2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 CWP No.19339 of 2026 Date of decision: June 25th, 2026 Gurinder Jagdeo .....Petitioner Versus District Magistrate Ludhiana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present: Mr. Varun Mittal and Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Saurav Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.5. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a civil writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent Nos.2 and 4 to defer the physical possession of the mortgaged property i.e. residential house and factory situated at Khanna for 15 days on humanitarian grounds. 2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5 has submitted that the petitioner is not the owner of the residential premises. It is further submitted that the possession of the factory has already been taken. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 has further pointed out that it is the daughter-in-law of the petitioner, who is the owner of the premises. 3. Learned counsel f

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/gurinder-jagdeo-vs-district-magistrate