# FIRDOS AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-06-22
Citation: CRWP 7366/2026
Petitioner: FIRDOS AND ANOTHER
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRWP&case_no=7366&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-06-22&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 146 CRWP-7366-2026 Date of decision :22.06.2026 FIRDOS AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Aazam Khan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shashank Bhandari, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are seeking protection of their lives and liberty as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Shashank Bhandari, Addl. A.G., Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Service of notice to the private respondents is dispensed with as no adverse order is passed against them. 4. As per petition and documents enclosed therewith i.e. Aadhar Card issued by the Government of India, petitioner No.1-Firdos is aged 22 years and petitioner No.2- Sharukh Khan is aged 30 years. The petitioners are residing together. MANOJ KUMAR 2026.06.22 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-7366-2026 -2- 5. The petitioners have made

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/firdos-and-another-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others