# BANK OF INDIA vs SHARAD RAJARAM KHADTARE

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2026-06-22
Citation: WP/15893/2025
Petitioner: BANK OF INDIA
Respondent: SHARAD RAJARAM KHADTARE

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6ImFxRjBRQ0M5SVZXUW1GcmlEeEI0c1E9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiSlBKTXhuekoydlhpMFhtamJUbkZNbVpGUVYrTkUzSnBreDRkcFhvZ3cwcTRrbzRyUWxHcHVNU3l1cnZwTnBCL1VrZU9HdVlTNCtmY0lsa1psY1lIQmc9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjhhYTAzYzA5MTNkNzUxZjk4Y2Y5NDFlMjY5MTMyODk2NDRhZGY4NGQ5NWIxMjhmYmMxMjIwNTY0NWYxOWZlZWIiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782736397&signature=63a528f64e5603fb5593d24ab30b7d9f6c5bc166fbc47028a611d9aaada212b2)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

Neeta Sawant WP-15893 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 15893 OF 2025 Bank of India ...Petitioner V/s. Sharad Rajaram Khadtare ...Respondent ________________ Mr. Lancy D'souza with Ms. Deepika Agarwal i/b. Mr. V.M. Parkar, for the Petitioner. Mr. Nitin Kulkarni, for the Respondent. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Reserved On : 12 June 2026. Pronounced On: 22 June 2026. Judgment: 1) The issue that arises for consideration in the present Petition is whether an employee dismissed from service on commission of grave misconduct, who raises belated industrial dispute, can be permitted to take advantage of his own wrong and whether his dismissal can be set aside only on account of employer’s inability to produce complete enquiry proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal. 2) The Respondent-employee was dismissed from service on 18 October 2000 but raised industrial dispute 13 years later on 14 October 2013 leading to making of reference by the appropriate Government. The Page No.1 of 20 22 June 2026 Neeta Sawant WP-15893 OF 2025 Bank had destroyed records relating to disciplinary enquiry and was unable to produce 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/bank-of-india-vs-sharad-rajaram-khadtare