# AROCKIYASAMY vs SANTHAL

Court: madras High Court
Date: 2026-06-24
Petitioner: AROCKIYASAMY
Respondent: SANTHAL

[Official PDF on madras High Court website](https://mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/index.php/casestatus/viewpdf/2089539)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

A.S.(MD)No.80 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI A.S.(MD)No.80 of 2021 Arockiyasamy .. Appellant Vs. 1.Santhal 2.S.Nirmala 3.Manivelraja 4.S.Mairyathangam 5.S.Muthu .. Respondents Prayer : Appeal Suit is filed under Order 41 Rule 4 read with Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Judge, Sivagangai, dated 24.10.2019, made in O.S.No.16 of 2013. For Appellant : Mr.K.Muraleedharan, Advocate For R1 & R2 : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam, Advocate 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 09/07/2026 03:44:34 pm ) A.S.(MD)No.80 of 2021 For R3 : No Appearance JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant has addressed a letter dated 22.06.2026, requesting the Registry to list the present Appeal Suit under the caption “For Withdrawal”. Accordingly, the matter is listed before this Court today under the said caption. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today (24.06.2026), the learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Appeal Suit and has also made an endorsement in the bundle to that effect. 3. I

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/arockiyasamy-vs-santhal