# AMARJIT SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-06-22
Citation: CRM-M 24058/2026
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=24058&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-06-22&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

-1- 204 + 218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24058-2026 (O&M) WITH CRM-M-27846-2026 Date of Decision: 22.06.2026 1. CRM-M-24058-2026 AMARJIT SINGH ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent 2. CRM-M-27846-2026 PAWAN MAHAJAN ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-24058-2026. Mr. Vishnu Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner (through VC) in CRM-M-27846-2026. Dr. D.S. Lamba, Addl. A.G. Punjab. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Petitioners Amarjit Singh and Pawan Mahajan have sought grant of regular bail under Sections 483 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in case arising out of FIR No.9 dated 28.07.2022 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 7, 7A, 8, 12, 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 316(5), 318(4), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya CHIRANJEEV SINGH 2026.06.22 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-24058-2026 CRM-M-27846-2026 -2- Sanhita, 2023 read with Sections 65, 66, 66-C, 66-D of Information and Technology Act, 2000, registered at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, District Ludhiana. 2. 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/june/amarjit-singh-vs-state-of-punjab