# YUVRAJ SETHI vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-13
Citation: CRM-M 29817/2026
Petitioner: YUVRAJ SETHI
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=29817&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-13&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-29817-2026 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (232) CRM-M-29817-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 13.07.2026 Yuvraj Sethi …... Petitioner V/s State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jaiveer Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Adeshwar S. Pannu, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Deepak Jaglan, Advocate for the complainant. ***** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in this petition under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 is for the grant of the regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.297 dated 20.11.2025 under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of BNS (Sections 406, 420, 120-B, 465, 468, 467 and 471 of IPC), registered at Police Station Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib. 2. The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner contends that prima facie, taking the allegations to be correct, the dispute appears to be civil in nature. Be that as it may, as the petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2026 but none of the 12 prosecution witnesses has been examined so VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.14 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-29817-

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/yuvraj-sethi-vs-state-of-punjab