# WRIT - C No. 22472 of 2026 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2026-07-02
Citation: WRIT - C No. 22472 of 2026 at Allahabad
Petitioner: WRIT - C No. 22472 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=95176)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 22472 of 2026 The Oriental Insurance Company Limited .....Petitioner(s) Versus Smt Babita And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankur Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Ankur Mehrotra, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Shyam Singh, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents. 2. It has been rightly pointed out by learned counsel for petitioner that requirement for process of conciliation as provided under Section 22-C of Legal Services Authority Act, 1987, was not carried out by Permanent Lok Adalat in impugned order, except a general reference which is not sufficient as held by this Court in the case of Manager Life Insurance Corporation of India, Basti vs. Permanent Lok Adalat, Basti and others, 2021:AHC:151400 and relevant paragraphs of the judgment are reproduced hereinafter: “6. विश्लेषण (क) वर्तमान प्रकरण में उत्पन्न विधिक प्रश्न, जिसका उल्लेख इस निर्णय के प्रस्तर 1 में किया गया है, उस पर दोनों पक्षों की बहस के मद्देनजर, निर्णय लेने के लिये, सर्वप्रथम विधिक सेवा प्राधिकरण अधिनियम1983, के अधिनियमित करने के उद्देश्य का उल्ले

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/writ-c-no-22472-of-2026-at-allahabad