# VIVEK vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-16
Citation: CRM-M 23594/2026
Petitioner: VIVEK
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=23594&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-16&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-23594-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (204) CRM-M-23594-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.07.2026 VIVEK … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Harkirat Singh Thind, Advocate for Ms. Himani Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG Haryana. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 read with Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 (corresponding Sections of Cr.P.C. are 438 and 482) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.225 dated 20.07.2025 under Sections 115(2) [323 IPC], 190 [149 IPC], 191 (3) [148 IPC], 333 [452 IPC] and 351 (2) [506 IPC] of the BNS, 2023 [Sections 3(2)(va) and 3(1)(s) of SC and ST Act, 2018 added later on and subsequently deleted on 12.03.2026 registered at Po- lice Station Saran, District Faridabad, Haryana. 2. This Court, vide order dated 01.05.2026, had directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of their arrest, they were ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating O

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/vivek-vs-state-of-haryana