# VIKRAM KOHLI ALIAS VIKRAM SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CRM-M 31481/2026
Petitioner: VIKRAM KOHLI ALIAS VIKRAM SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=31481&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 143 CRM-M-31481-2026 Decided on: 14.07.2026 VIKRAM KOHLI ALIAS VIKRAM SINGH ……Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ..…Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Mr. Manish Kanora, Advocate Mr. Raghav Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral) 1. Report from the District and Sessions Judge, Amritsar, in terms of the order dated 29.05.2026 passed by this Court has been received. As per it, order Annexure P-2 was passed on 05.05.2025 and order Annexure P-3 was passed on 05.06.2025. There is nothing in the report that procedure prescribed by Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was adhered to before passing the order Annexure P-3. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State of Punjab and makes a statement at Bar that in view of the report sent by the District and Sessions Judge concerned, he does not intend to file response to the petition. GAURAV BHARDWAJ 2026.07.14 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-31481-2026 -2- 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/vikram-kohli-alias-vikram-singh-vs-state-of-punjab