# UPENDER SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-17
Citation: CWP 11937/2026
Petitioner: UPENDER SINGH AND OTHERS
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=11937&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-17&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CWP-11937-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 CWP-11937-2026 Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 Upender Singh and others .… Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay Singh and Paras Chaudhary, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners on the post on which they are working from the date of their appointment with all consequential benefits in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ‘Jaggo vs. Union of India and others, SCC OnLine SC 3826’. 2. At the very outset, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon a judgment dated 12.05.2026 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petitions having leading case CWP-1770-2026, titled as ‘Deepak Singh and others vs. State of Haryana and others’ including petition be

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/upender-singh-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others