# TARSEM SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-16
Citation: CRM-M 26584/2026
Petitioner: TARSEM SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=26584&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-16&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209 CRM-M-26584-2026 Date of decision: 16.07.2026 TARSEM SINGH .... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Ms. Varsha Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. M.S. Toor, AAG Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0173 dated 10.11.2025 under Sections 118(1), 115(2), 126(2), 351(2) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Moonak, District Sangrur. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 11.05.2026 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State Counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined investigation in terms of order dated 11.05.2026 and is not required for custodial interrogation. In this view of the matter, interim order dated 11.05.2026 is made absolute. KUSUM 2026.07.16 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh CRM-M-26584-2026 -2- However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the invest

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/tarsem-singh-vs-state-of-punjab