# SURAJ PARKASH JOSHI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-16
Citation: CWP 21309/2026
Petitioner: SURAJ PARKASH JOSHI
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=21309&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-16&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CWP-21309-2026 (O&M) 1 of 7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 CWP-21309-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.07.2026 Suraj Parkash Joshi ...Petitioner(s) Vs. State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Anurag Goyal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Lather, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, D.A.G., Haryana, *** NIDHI GUPTA, J. Present Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order Annexure P-7 dated 09.07.2026, whereby the petitioner is ordered to be transferred from Narnaul to Head Office, Panchkula, when the petitioner is on the verge of his retirement and is going to retire within next 8 months i.e. on 28.02.2027; and the instructions/policy of the Government of Haryana are very categoric, whereby time and again in each and every department, it is mentioned qua every cadre that a person, who is going to retire within next one year, shall not be transferred unless he desires. DIVYANSHI 2026.07.17 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document C

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/suraj-parkash-joshi-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors