# SUNIL KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-16
Citation: CRM-M 33185/2026
Petitioner: SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=33185&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-16&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-33185-2026 (O&M) -1- 102 2026:PHHC:096832 ieiee'aies ohaea chao IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33185-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 Sunil Kumar ...Petitioner(s) Vs. State of Punjab ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT Present: | Mr. Monty Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Vibhuti Narania, Advocate for the complainant. oko KK N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNSS, 2023) with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.106, dated 24.04.2026, registered under Sections 281, 106(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNS) [Sections 279 and 304-A IPC] and Section 105 of BNS, 2023 [Section 304 IPC] added later on, at Police Station Moti Nagar, Ludhiana, District Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana, Punjab. 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail, this Court had noticed the following contentions:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR nor there is any averment, which even remotely

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/sunil-kumar-vs-state-of-punjab