# SUKHPREET SINGH vs PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-15
Citation: CWP 21276/2026
Petitioner: SUKHPREET SINGH
Respondent: PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=21276&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-15&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CWP-21276-2026 Date of decision : 15.07.2026 Sukhpreet Singh ….Petitioner V/S Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others ….Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. I.P.S. Deol, Advocate with Mr. Yash Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Ahuja, D.A.G., Punjab. **** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner, who was employed through out-sourced agency, namely Vision Plus Security Control Pvt. Ltd., has filed the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner back in service on the post held by him prior to his illegal termination/removal with all consequential benefits. 2. On receipt of advance copy of the petition, Ms. Shreya B. Sarin, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.1, 3 & 4-PSPCL and submits that the petitioner has not disclosed the factum of being employed through the out-sourced agency, namely Vision Plus Security Control Pvt. Ltd., and even the said out-sourced agency has also not been made party-respondent in the instant petition. 3. Faced w

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/sukhpreet-singh-vs-punjab-state-power-corporation-limited-and-ors