# SHEEJAL ALIAS SEEJAL ALIAS NAGMA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-13
Citation: CRM-M 3866/2026
Petitioner: SHEEJAL ALIAS SEEJAL ALIAS NAGMA
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=3866&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-13&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-3866-2026 -1- (221) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3866-2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 SHEEJAL ALIAS SEEJAL ALIAS NAGMA ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate with Mr. R.K. Poonia, Advocate Mr. B.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Luhani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. The prayer in the present petition under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 is for the grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.232 dated 24.04.2024 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 304, 323, 506, 34 IPC (Section 302 IPC converted into 304 IPC) at Police Station Old Industrial, District Panipat. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the FIR has been registered under Section 302 IPC. Later, the challan was submitted under Section 304 IPC as the deceased Fateh Singh has died on account of a heart condition and not due to the injury suffered by him which are simple in nature. In fact, the CCTV footage of the occurrence would reveal that there JITESH LAL 2026.07.13 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of thi

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/sheejal-alias-seejal-alias-nagma-vs-state-of-haryana