# SHANTI PARKASH SHARMA vs UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-14
Citation: CWP 23442/2019
Petitioner: SHANTI PARKASH SHARMA
Respondent: UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=23442&case_year=2019&order_date=2026-07-14&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 Date of decision: 14.07.2026 (1) CWP-28283-2018 (O&M) Om Parkash Sehgal vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd and Others (2) CWP-23442-2019 (O&M) Shanti Parkash Sharma vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4 ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners have been denied 3rd ACP on account of they having forgone the promotion for 6 months to the post of Circle Assistant, however, similarly circumstanced Balwan Singh, who was working as Commercial Assistant was also promoted as Circle Assistant, however, he has forgone promotion for 1 year, as is apparent from the order dated 01.03.2011, Annexure P-6, whereby his promotion was cancelled, however, he has been granted the benefit of 3rd ACP w.e.f. 13.11.2010 vide order dated 29.11.2012, Annexure P-7. He prays that their claim be re-considered in terms thereof. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/shanti-parkash-sharma-vs-uttar-haryana-bijli-vitran-nigam-ltd-and-others