# SANTOSH KUMARI AND OTHERS vs SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-13
Citation: FAO 3181/2005
Petitioner: SANTOSH KUMARI AND OTHERS
Respondent: SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=FAO&case_no=3181&case_year=2005&order_date=2026-07-13&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

302 FAO-3181-2005 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.07.2026 SANTOSH KUMARI AND OTHERS ....APPELLANTS VERSUS SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. D.K. Dogra, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral) CM-17905-CII-2024 1. The present application has been filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking exemption from filing an application for bringing on record the legal representatives of respondent No. 2. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and appellants are exempted from filing an application for bringing on record the legal representatives of respondent No.2. 3. Application stands disposed of. FAO-3181-2005 4. Notice was issued to respondent No.1, who is owner of the offending vehicle by way of publication in newspaper for 09.04.2026. However, none has appeared on his behalf and he is proceeded ex parte. PRIYANKA THAKUR 2026.07.15 19:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 21.12.2004 passed in MACT case No.14 of 15.01.2004 decided by the MACT, Rupnagar (for short “Tribunal”) in a 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/santosh-kumari-and-others-vs-sunil-kumar-and-others