# SANGEETA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-16
Citation: CWP 21293/2026
Petitioner: SANGEETA
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=21293&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-16&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21293-2026 DECIDED ON:16.07.2026 SANGEETA .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS .....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Mukesh Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) 1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and regularize the services of the petitioners in terms of the policy instructions dated 18.03.2011 (Annexure P-1) with effect from 18.03.2011, by treating them at par with similarly situated Computer Operators appointed on contractual basis and subsequently regularized vide order dated 23.12.2011 (Annexure P-2), and in the light of the judgments passed by this Court in CWP No. 27344 of 2013, Hargopal and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others, decided on 02.04.2026 (Annexure P-3), and CWP No. 5307 of 2025, Kartar Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others, decided on 06.02.2026 (Annexure P-4), and further directing the respondents to grant all consequential service benefits, including the benef

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/sangeeta-vs-state-of-punjab-and-ors