# SANDEEP vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-07-15
Citation: CRM-M 21442/2026
Petitioner: SANDEEP
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=21442&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-07-15&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-21442-2026 -1- (224) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21442-2026 Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 SANDEEP ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Yajat Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Diya Sodhi, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.(ORAL) The prayer in the present petition under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 is for the grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.404 dated 25.11.2024 registered under Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2), 109(1), 351(3) (Sections 148, 149, 323, 307, 506 IPC) and Sections 42 of Prisons Act at Police Station Baldev Nagar, District Ambala. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The complainant/Pardeep has received only one simple injury on the head which has been attributed to multiple accused including the petitioner. As the petitioner is in custody since 25.11.2024 but only 05 of the 25 prosecution witnesses have been examined so far, the Trial of the present case is not likely to be concluded anytime soon and therefore, he is entitled to the concession of bail. JITESH 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/july/sandeep-vs-state-of-haryana-punjab-haryana-2